Hollingsworth v. Pemberton
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
The plaintiff has appealed from an order granting a new trial after judgment for damages for injuries sustained as the result of an automobile collision had been entered pursuant to a verdict which was rendered in her favor.
The real question involved on this appeal is whether the trial court abused its discretion in granting a new trial on the theory that the plaintiff failed to prove that the driver of a truck, with which the plaintiff’s automobile collided, was the agent or employee of the defendant Moye Forwarding Company, as distinguished from an independent contractor. Granting that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Press Publishing Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Hillen v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Rosenberg v. Geo. A. Moore & Co.California Supreme Court · 1924
- Tucker v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Eng-Skell Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bohanon v. James McClatchy Publishing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
- Batt v. San Diego Sun Publishing Co., Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1937
- Judd v. ChabekCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Kelley v. CorcoranCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936