Legal Opinion

Hanson v. Cordoza

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 17, 1930No. Docket No. 7169PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESTON (H. L.), J., pro tem.

This is an action for damages for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff, Flora Planson, in an automobile collision between her car and one driven by defendant Elden Cordoza. The action was dismissed as to defendants Kenneth F. Cordoza and Stephen Alfred Cordoza. The case was tried before the court without a jury, and judgment was entered in favor of plaintiff and against the defendants Elden Cordoza, J. S. P. Cordoza and Lizzie Cordoza for $3,450.65. From this judgment, the last-named defendants prosecute this appeal.

Appellants make two contentions for a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Treadwell v. NickelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Robinson v. Western Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Gornstein v. PriverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  4. Harris v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Wilbur v. WilburCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Donahoo v. Kress House Moving Corp.California Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Sanders v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Washam v. Peerless Automatic Staple MacHine Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. Inouye v. Gilboy Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Hechler v. McDonnellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API