Legal Opinion

Inouye v. Gilboy Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 16, 1931No. Docket No. 7821PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

This action arose out of a collision between plaintiff’s automobile and defendant’s truck. By his complaint plaintiff sought to recover for damage to his automobile and by its cross-complaint defendant sought to recover damages to its truck. Upon a trial by the court sitting without a jury, judgment was entered in favor of plaintiff and against defendant on both the complaint and cross-complaint and from this judgment defendant appeals.

On this appeal it is contended that there was no negligence on the part of appellant and that even if appellant was negligent the respondent was guilty of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Reaugh v. Cudahy Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Hanson v. CordozaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. McKee v. ChaseIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Cooley v. BakerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  3. Mills v. Southwest Builders, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Reynolds v. FilomeoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Washam v. Peerless Automatic Staple MacHine Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API