Legal Opinion

Hechler v. McDonnell

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 22, 1941No. Civ. 12743PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

This is an appeal by defendant from a judgment, after verdict, in favor of plaintiffs in the amount of $3,500.

About 2:30 P. M. on July 18, 1938, plaintiffs, husband and wife, entered the restaurant of defendant, walked across a light colored terrazzo floor to stools located upon a black colored terrazzo platform which was 8 to 10 inches above the floor level. Plaintiff Minnie Mae mounted the platform, oc6. cupied a stool next to her husband, ordered and ate her lunch. While thus engaged in consuming her viands she observed a man enter from the kitchen and sweep the floor and platform. He…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Tuttle v. CrawfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Shanley v. American Olive Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Mautino v. Sutter Hospital Assn.California Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Gornstein v. PriverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Vaughn v. Montgomery Ward & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1950
  2. Sanders v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Ahlquist v. Mulvaney Realty Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Heine v. John R. Thompson Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  5. Lay v. Pacific Perforating Co.California Court of Appeal · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API