Estate of Thompson
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.
This is an appeal by Don R. Lehman from an order denying his petition for an allowance of attorney’s fees in addition to an allowance of executor’s fees. He had acted in the dual capacity as executor and attorney for himself as executor in proceedings for the probate of the estate of Carrie Haseltine Thompson, deceased.
Mr. Lehman, hereinafter designated the petitioner, is a duly licensed attorney at law and in the lifetime of the decedent acted as her attorney. By a second codicil attached to her will she nominated him as her sole executor and further directed, “that in the event [he] acts as…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- McConnell v. DoolittleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Lockbihler v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- In Re Estate of MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Estate of SchererCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Stearns v. AbbottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Estate of RussellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Hembree v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Pizarro v. ReynosoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Copley v. CopleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Estate of KarkeetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.