Legal Opinion

State v. Hageman

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 16, 1982No. 8121SC920PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

By his first four assignments of error, defendant argues that the trial court erred in denying his motions for dismissal of the charges, for nonsuit, and for setting aside the verdicts. As to the motions to dismiss and the motion for nonsuit, defendant contends that there was insufficient evidence (a) that he had reasonable grounds to believe the ring to have been stolen at the time he bought it and (b) that he acted with a dishonest purpose in receiving either the ring or the silverware. On the question of setting aside the verdict, defendant contends that the verdict was…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. People v. RojasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  4. State v. WitherspoonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  5. People v. JaffeNew York Court of Appeals · 1906

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. WardrettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  2. State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  3. State v. HaightCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  4. State v. HagemanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API