Legal Opinion
State v. Hageman
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided March 16, 1982No. 8121SC920Published
1Opinion of the Court
289 S.E.2d 89 (1982)
STATE of North Carolina
v.
Bruce Gilbert HAGEMAN.
No. 8121SC920.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina.
March 16, 1982.
Atty. Gen. Rufus L. Edmisten by Asst. Atty. Gen. Robert L. Hillman, Raleigh, for the State.
William B. Gibson, Winston-Salem, for defendant-appellant.
HEDRICK, Judge.
By his first four assignments of error, defendant argues that the trial court erred in denying his motions for dismissal of the charges, for nonsuit, and for setting aside the verdicts. As to the motions to dismiss and the motion for nonsuit, defendant contends that there was insufficient evidence (a)…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- People v. RojasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- State v. WitherspoonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- People v. JaffeNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.