People v. Jaffe
New York Court of Appeals
The defendant, J,afle, was indicted for the crime of criminally receiving stolen goods, knowing the same to have been stolen. He was subsequently convicted of an attempt to commit the said crime, and judgment of conviction was rendered by the Court of General Sessions of the Peace in and for the city and county of Hew York on the 24th day of May, 1904. He took an appeal to' the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, First Department.
Read the full summary
The defendant, J,afle, was indicted for the crime of criminally receiving stolen goods, knowing the same to have been stolen. He was subsequently convicted of an attempt to commit the said crime, and judgment of conviction was rendered by the Court of General Sessions of the Peace in and for the city and county of Hew York on the 24th day of May, 1904. He took an appeal to' the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, First Department. This appeal was argued upon the 20th day of March, 1906, and the judgment of conviction was ■ unanimously affirmed upon the 20th day of April, 1906. The…
1Opinion of the Court
Clarke, J.:
The defendant was indicted for the crime of criminally receiving stolen property, in that “ twenty yards of cloth of the value of twenty-five cents each yard, of the goods, chattels and personal property of F. Horton Goddard, Wilmer A. Baldwin and Joseph Mathers, copartners in trade, then and there doing business in and by the firm name and style of J. W. Goddard & Sons, by a certain person or persons to the grand jury aforesaid unknown then lately before feloniously stolen, *279taken and carried away from the said copartners unlawfully and unjustly did feloniously receive and have,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. . SullivanNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- People v. . GardnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- People v. . MoranNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- State v. WilsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1862
- People v. . MillsNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by88 opinions
- United States v. Philip Berrigan, in No. 72-1938, and Elizabeth McAlister Appeal of Elizabeth McAlister InCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Todd Tykarsky A/K/A Toddyty63 A/K/A Golpher12345Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Martin Molina Oviedo, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. MyersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- People v. RojasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.