Legal Opinion
Rann, Robert W. v. Chao, Elaine
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided October 14, 2003No. 02-5200PublishedCited by 144 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Senior Circuit Judge STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS.
STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS, Senior Circuit Judge:
Robert W. Rann claims that the Department of Labor denied him promotion because of his age, in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634. The district court dismissed his complaint for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, finding that Rann had not fulfilled the prerequisites for suit under either of the routes to court provided by the Act. He had not exhausted his administrative remedies, which both parties assumed was essential to suit…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Office of Personnel Management v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Edward Haase v. William S. Sessions, Director, F.B.I.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by144 opinions
- Settles v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- James Reynolds v. Daniel M. TangherliniCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Shikles v. Sprint/United Management Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Robert E. Hill v. Jack E. Potter, Postmaster GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Achagzai v. Broadcasting Board of GovernorsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
139 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.