Legal Opinion

Arden v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided August 13, 1987No. L.A. 32118PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT.

In this proceeding we review the unanimous recommendation by the Review Department of the State Bar Court that petitioner, Lawrence John Arden, be disbarred for misappropriating one client’s funds, entering into an improper business transaction with a second, and wilfully failing to use reasonable diligence and judgment on behalf of a third.

Petitioner contends (1) that the hearing panel abused its discretion in denying his request to reopen the proceedings to consider new evidence, including a proposed polygraph examination of petitioner, (2) that the findings, conclusions…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. People v. FlannelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. People v. ThorntonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Bradpiece v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Segretti v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Matter of SwartzArizona Supreme Court · 1984

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Peugeot v. United States Trustee (In Re Crayton)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  2. Carter v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Gary v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Arm v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Rosenthal v. Justices of the Supreme Court of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API