Legal Opinion

People v. Flannel

California Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1979No. Crim. 20869PublishedCited by 607 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*672Opinion

TOBRINER, J.

Defendant Charles M. Flannel appeals from a judgment of conviction entered on jury verdicts finding him guilty of second degree murder (Pen. Code, § 187), and finding affirmatively on a firearm use allegation (Pen. Code, §§ 1203, subd. (6) and 12022.5). He contends that the court erred in failing to instruct the jury sua sponte that defendant’s honest but unreasonable belief that he must defend himself from deadly attack negates malice so that the offense is reduced from murder to manslaughter. Defendant also urges that the court should have given requested instructions on…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. People v. SedenoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. People v. WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. People v. ThorntonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. People v. HendersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  5. People v. ConleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by607 opinions

  1. People v. DillonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. People v. BrevermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  4. People v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. People v. RodriguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986

602 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API