Legal Opinion

Matter of Swartz

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 1984No. SB-72-3PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FELDMAN, Justice.

A Local Administrative Committee (Committee) of the State Bar of Arizona filed a complaint on September 8, 1981, alleging that John F. Swartz (respondent) violated Disciplinary Rule 2-106, Code of Professional Responsibility, and Rule 29(b)(1) of the Rules of the Arizona Supreme Court, 17A A.R.S. 1 , by charging a clearly excessive fee. In an amended complaint, the Committee charged that respondent’s conduct also violated, inter alia, DR 1-102(A)(5) (conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice).

The Committee held hearings on three separate dates, ending in February,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. ValdezArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Thompson v. Sun City Community Hospital, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Rooney v. . Second Avenue Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  4. Goodman v. Newzona Investment Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1966
  5. State Bar of Arizona v. Arizona Land Title & Trust Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1961

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. In re MartinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. KorotkiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  3. In Re the Discipline of DorothySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  4. In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, KerstingArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Haines v. Liggett Group, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1993

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API