Legal Opinion
Wojahn v. Faul
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 11, 1952No. 35,591PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Christianson, Justice.
Appeal from an order sustaining plaintiffs’ demurrer to defendants’ counterclaim.
Plaintiffs, husband and wife, purchased a farm from defendants, husband and wife, upon contract for deed. The contract provided in part:
“This Contract- includes the assignment of a present lease, which expires on March 1st, 1949. Possession is given as of this date, subject, however, to a present lease and the rights and privileges thereunder.”
Subsequently plaintiffs paid the full purchase price, and defendants executed a warranty deed of the premises warranting against encumbrances, “Except…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. Royal Mineral Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Hammel v. FeighSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Kammrath v. KiddSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- Blake v. J. Neils Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Rue v. KutzbachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
3Cited by3 opinions
- Odens Family Properties, LLC v. Twin Cities Stores, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2005
- Wojahn v. FaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Murillo v. Mayo Clinic Health System-Southeast Minnesota RegionDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2021