Legal Opinion

Wojahn v. Faul

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 11, 1952No. 35,591PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Christianson, Justice.

Appeal from an order sustaining plaintiffs’ demurrer to defendants’ counterclaim.

Plaintiffs, husband and wife, purchased a farm from defendants, husband and wife, upon contract for deed. The contract provided in part:

“This Contract- includes the assignment of a present lease, which expires on March 1st, 1949. Possession is given as of this date, subject, however, to a present lease and the rights and privileges thereunder.”

Subsequently plaintiffs paid the full purchase price, and defendants executed a warranty deed of the premises warranting against encumbrances, “Except…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. Royal Mineral Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  2. Hammel v. FeighSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  3. Kammrath v. KiddSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  4. Blake v. J. Neils Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  5. Rue v. KutzbachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Odens Family Properties, LLC v. Twin Cities Stores, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2005
  2. Wojahn v. FaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  3. Murillo v. Mayo Clinic Health System-Southeast Minnesota RegionDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API