Legal Opinion

Kammrath v. Kidd

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 29, 1903No. Nos. 13,449—(72)PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Action in the district court for Martin county to recover possession of certain grain or for $150, the value thereof, and $40 damages for its detention in case possession could not be had. The case was tried before Quinn, J., and a jury, which rendered a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $116.62. From an order denying a motion for a new trial defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

LEWIS. J.

June 22, 1901, defendant was the owner of a certain farm, upon which was a growing crop of wheat and oats, put in by a tenant upon shares; a one-third interest going to the owner. An arrangement was entered into on that day by which it was agreed that the land should be sold to- plaintiff, and pursuant to such arrangement, on July 1 of the same year, defendant executed a warranty deed in the usual form, and left it with a banker by the name of Broun, to whom plaintiff was to pay the money expressed in the *381deed as a consideration — $3,200. On the following July 9, defendant cut and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rooney v. KoenigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  2. Erickson v. PatersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  3. Cummings v. NewellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Florida Moss Products Co. v. City of LeesburgSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  2. Vought v. KanneCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
  3. Grabow v. McCracken Et Ux.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. Cooper v. KennedyNebraska Supreme Court · 1910
  5. First Minneapolis Trust Co. v. Lancaster Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API