Legal Opinion

Wojahn v. Faul

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 9, 1954No. 36,216PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Thomas Gallagher, Justice.

Action by plaintiffs, as grantees in a warranty deed conveying certain farm premises in Cottonwood county, against defendants, as grantors, to recover damages sustained by plaintiffs as the result of defendants’ breach of an express warranty that plaintiffs should have quiet and peaceful possession thereof as of May 1, 1949. This case has been before us previously on an appeal from an order sustaining a demurrer to the answer (Wojahn v. Faul, 235 Minn. 397, 51 N. W. [2d] 97) ; and on application for habeas corpus in litigation arising out of the transaction tried in…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Fritz v. PuseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  2. State v. Minnesota Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  3. Bergquist v. KreidlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  4. Lee v. ZaskeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  5. Wojahn v. HalterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brasseaux v. GirouardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1968
  2. St. Onge, Stewart, Johnson & Reens, LLC v. Media Group, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  3. George E. Antrim, III, PLLC v. Samar Sabri a/k/a Samar M. Tomala a/k/a Samar Meri Tomala a/k/a Samar Meri ToumalahCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API