Legal Opinion

City of Cleveland v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1965No. 38692PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant assigned 55 errors but reduced these assigned errors to four questions to be decided by this court. The four questions are as follows:

1. Has the commission fixed excessive rates which have confiscated the property of appellant and its ratepayers?

2. May the commission utilize published trend factors to aid in valuation of property for the determination of the statutory rate base of the company’s property?

3. Is the company’s coal escalation clause an unconstitutional delegation by the commission of its power to set rates?

*844. Is the commission’s order allowing the rate increase…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. East Ohio Gas Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1938
  3. East Ohio Gas Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Lindsey v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1924
  5. City of Delphos v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. City of Evansville v. Southern Indiana Gas & Electric Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Duff v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  5. City of Akron v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1966

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API