Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Rose v. Town of Greenwood
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided October 26, 1945No. 34,041PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Peterson, Jitstice.
This is a proceeding in mandamus to compel the town board of the toAvn of Greenwood in Hennepin county and .its board of supervisors to establish a cartway.
Pursuant to Minn. St. 1941, § 163.15, subd. 2 (Mason St. 1927, § 2585, subd. 2), which so far as here pertinent provides that—
“Any town board shall, on petition of the owner of a tract of land of not less than five acres in area, who has no access thereto except over the lands of others, establish a cartway not more than two rods wide connecting his land with a public road; * * * the amount of damages, if any, to be paid…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State ex rel. Townsend v. Board of Park CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Franklin v. WardenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1864
- Johnson v. Town of Chisago LakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- State Ex Rel. Spurck v. PennebakerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Kroyer v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Spurck v. Civil Service BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Zion Evangelical Lutheran Church of Detroit Lakes v. City of Detroit LakesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- In Re DanielSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- Lafayette Land Co. v. Village of Tonka BaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Horton v. Township of HelenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.