State Ex Rel. Spurck v. Pennebaker
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Julius J. Olson, Justice.
This case in its substantial aspects might well be deemed a companion case to that of State ex rel. Sime v. Pennebaker, 215 Minn. 75, 9 N. W. (2d) 257. As in that case, we shall refer to relator in the court below as plaintiff and to respondent as defendant. The appeal to this court is from an order denying defendant’s motion for amended findings or a new trial.
Unlike the Sime case, there was here a trial upon issues duly framed, and the record contains the testimony offered and received at the trial, including as well the findings of fact and conclusions of law made…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Laurisch v. PohlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- State ex rel. Casmey v. TealSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- State Ex Rel. Sime v. PennebakerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
3Cited by5 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Spurck v. Civil Service BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- State Ex Rel. Spurck v. Civil Service BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- Spurck v. Civil Service BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- State Ex Rel. Rose v. Town of GreenwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- State ex rel. Spurck v. Civil Service BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950