Legal Opinion

In Re Daniel

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 20, 2003No. CX-01-1820PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GILBERT, Justice.

This case presents the issue of whether a property owner who has access to his lake cabin property via a navigable waterway can invoke Minn.Stat. § 164.08, subd. 2(a) (2002), to establish a cartway over the lands of others. Thomas Daniel, owner of a parcel of land bordering Lake Vermillion in an unorganized territory, petitioned the St. Louis County Board of Commissioners requesting that a cartway be established over the adjoining land of Donald Schoch. The board of commissioners, acting as a town board pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 164.08, subd. 2(a) and (b), held a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Lefto v. Hoggsbreath Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  3. State Ex Rel. Rose v. Town of GreenwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  4. In Re Daniel for the Establishment of CartwayCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bond v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  2. In re Private Road in Speers Boro, IISupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. In Re RollinsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
  4. Bond v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  5. RK Midway, LLC v. Metropolitan CouncilCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API