Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Townsend v. Board of Park Commissioners

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 21, 1907No. Nos. 14,897—(82)PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Appeal by the relator from an order of the district court for Henne-pin county, Holt, J., overruling a demurrer to the answer.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Proceedings in mandamus to compel the board of park commissioners of the city of Minneapolis to resume the duties imposed upon it respecting the maintenance and management of the public parkway of that city known as Hennepin Boulevard.

It appears from the pleadings, among other things, that the board of park commissioners of the city of Minneapolis was created and organized pursuant to chapter 281, p. 404, Sp. Laws 1883. That statute authorized, in general terms, the park board to acquire for park and parkway purposes lands adjacent to or within the city, either by purchase, donation, or…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Davis v. . the Mayor, C., of New-YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
  2. Goszler v. Corporation of GeorgetownSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
  3. Wabash Railroad v. DefianceSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Milhau v. . SharpNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
  5. Tilly v. Mitchell & Lewis Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1904

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Village of Grosse Pointe Shores v. AyresMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Wulf v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  3. City of Lynchburg v. PetersSupreme Court of Virginia · 1926
  4. State Ex Rel. Gordon v. TaylorOhio Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Hames v. City of PolsonMontana Supreme Court · 1950

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API