Legal Opinion

Horton v. Township of Helen

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 3, 2001No. C4-00-1480PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STONEBURNER, Judge

Appellant Rodney Horton appeals from summary judgment granted to respondent Township of Helen on his petition for a ■writ of mandamus to compel the township to establish a cartway pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 164.08, subd. 2 (2000). The township’s motion was based on the merits and on the assertion that the district court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction because Horton should have appealed directly to this court. The district court had jurisdiction, and because the township’s denial of the petition was not clearly against the evidence, based on an erroneous theory of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  3. DLH, Inc. v. RussSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  4. Honn v. City of Coon RapidsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  5. Cable Communications Board v. Nor-West Cable Communications PartnershipSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ullrich v. Newburg Township BoardCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
  2. Silver v. RidgewayCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
  3. J & W Asphalt, Inc. v. Belle Plaine Township, State of Minnesota, Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API