Legal Opinion
Kinzli v. City of Santa Cruz
District Court, N.D. California
Decided April 21, 1982No. C-80-2863 MHPPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PATEL, District Judge.
This case is presently before the court on the defendant’s motion for summary judgment as to all claims. Section I summarizes the complaint, and the succeeding sections consider the defendant’s challenges to various claims.
I
THE COMPLAINT
The central facts alleged in the amended complaint are as follows. The plaintiffs are Mrs. Margaret Kinzli, a 74-year-old widow, and her three children, Ernest and Philip Kinzli and Evelyn Goossen (“the Kinzlis”). The Kinzlis have for many years been the owners in fee simple of approximately 62 acres of essentially undeveloped land…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Young v. American Mini Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Baker v. Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- In Re Gilbert John Marino, Debtor. Placer Savings and Loan Association v. Edward M. Walsh, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Gilbert John MarinoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Thomas B. Sawyer v. County of Sonoma and Retirement Board of the County of Sonoma, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Nika Corp. v. City of Kansas City, Mo.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1984
- Kaiser Development Co. v. City & County of HonoluluDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.