Legal Opinion

Trentman v. Cox

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1928No. 20702PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

In considering whether the pedestrian, Addison D. Cox, plaintiff below, was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law, all facts in the record, or inferences to be drawn therefrom, must be resolved in his favor. Gibbs v. Village of Girard, 88 Ohio St., 34, 40, 102 N. E., 299; Ellis & Morton v. Ohio Life Ins. & Trust Co., 4 Ohio St., 628, 64 Am. Dec., 610; McDonald v. City of Pittsburgh, 278 Pa., 485, 123 A., 467.

Examining the evidence with this rule in mind, we find that the record discloses that at the time of the accident the pedestrian was crossing the Eighth street viaduct in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Knapp v. . BarrettNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Murphy v. Phila. Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  3. Hitt v. CarrIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  4. Schock v. CoolingMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Harker v. GruhlIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Glasco v. MendelmanOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Smith v. Zone CabsOhio Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Purdy v. KerentoffOhio Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Wolfe, Admr. v. BaskinOhio Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Dewitt v. Sandy Market, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1941

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API