Legal Opinion

Harker v. Gruhl

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 15, 1916No. 8,987PublishedCited by 17 opinions

From Decatur Circuit Court; Hugh WicJcens, Judge. Action by Katherine Gruhl against Isaiah Harker. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMoran, J.

On April 5, 1913, appellee, while attempting to cross Main street in the town of Hope, Indiana, was struck by appellant’s automobile, and she received severe injuries, which she alleges, in four paragraphs of complaint, were caused by the negligence of appellant, and for which she was awarded damages in the sum of $500.'

The jury trying the cause returned answers with the general verdict to forty-three interrogatories. The failure of the court to render judgment *179on the answers to interrogatories is the error relied upon for reversal by appellant. Many of the allegations of negligence charged…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Hennessey v. TaylorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  2. Lauson v. Town of Fond du LacWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Consolidated Stone Co. v. SummitIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Robbins v. Springfield Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
  5. Stringer v. FrostIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Green v. RuffinSupreme Court of Virginia · 1924
  2. Glasco v. MendelmanOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Frankfort v. OwensIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Smith v. Zone CabsOhio Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Bender v. PeayIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API