Legal Opinion

Wolfe, Admr. v. Baskin

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1940No. 27967PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

Several questions are presented by the record and they will be discussed in order.

The question that should be considered first is one made by the defendants. They maintain that the plaintiff cannot be prejudiced by any error in the record for the reason that the evidence, in any event, warrants a judgment in favor of the defendants as a matter of law.

The plaintiff in his petition alleged that the defendants were negligent as to speed, keeping lookout ahead, guiding the automobile and keeping it under control, and in failing to sound the horn, and to stop in obedience to the traffic light.

What…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Luby v. . the Hudson River Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  2. Deputy v. KimmellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Deming v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Gett v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Chicago City Railway Co. v. UhterIllinois Supreme Court · 1904

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Cox v. Hennis Freight LinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. Humphrey v. DentOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. City of Hubbard v. LuchanskyOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Stout v. EllingerOhio Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Cox v. Hennis Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API