Legal Opinion
Glasco v. Mendelman
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided July 26, 1944No. 29905PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.
During the course of this opinion the parties will be designated as they stood in the Court of Common Pleas, Alva Blasco as plaintiff and Sydney Mendelman as defendant.
The judgment entry in the Court of Appeals reads in part as follows:'
“This court finds that there is error in the said record and proceedings of said court prejudicial to the defendant-appellant, and that the trial court should have entered judgment in favor of the defendant.”
The judgment was by a divided court and no reason is stated in the entry as the basis for the conclusion reached by the majority.
By the opinion we are…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Universal Concrete Pipe Co. v. BassettOhio Supreme Court · 1936
- Matz v. J. L. Curtis Cartage Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1937
- Knapp v. . BarrettNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Smiley v. Arrow Spring Bed Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1941
- Kormos v. Cleveland Retail Credit Men's Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1936
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Erdman v. MestrovichOhio Supreme Court · 1951
- Robyn Crummett v. Donald J. CorbinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
- Elfers v. BrightOhio Court of Appeals · 1958
- Betras v. G. M. McKelvey Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1947
- Davis v. Brown Local SchoolsOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.