Legal Opinion

People v. Kramer

California Supreme Court

Decided August 23, 1897No. Crim. No. 269PublishedCited by 51 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from orders refusing to arrest the judgment and denying a new trial. B. N. Smith, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Fleet, J.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment convicting him of forgery, from an order refusing to arrest the judgment, and from an order denying a new trial.

1. The first objection urged is misconduct of the jury; but the record does not clearly disclose that any such in fact occurred. It is stated in an affidavit by defendant’s counsel, filed on the motion for a new trial, that during the taking of evidence, and while the jury were examining certain exhibits submitted for their inspection, affiants “ saw a number of the jurors commenting upon, and arguing about,” the exhibits, and pointing out to each…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  3. People v. FrigerioCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. People v. FooCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. People v. WestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. People v. ArandaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  2. People v. EggersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. People v. BainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. People v. KirkesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  5. People v. MajorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API