Legal Opinion
Resnick v. Magical Cruise Co., Ltd.
District Court, M.D. Florida
Decided June 25, 2001No. 6:00-cv-00898PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ANTOON, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Edward Resnick (“Resnick”) and Access Now, Inc. (“Access Now”) brought the instant action against Defendant Magical Cruise Company, Limited (“Magical”) under Title III of the Americans With Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Plaintiffs contend that Magical has discriminated against them because Magical’s cruise ships, the Disney Magic and the Disney Wonder, allegedly are not in compliance with the guidelines promulgated under the ADA regarding accessibility to persons with disabilities'.
This cause is currently before the Court on…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Botosan v. Paul McNally RealtyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Access Now, Inc. v. South Florida Stadium Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2001
- Steven Brother v. Tiger Partner, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2004
- Harty v. SRA/Palm Trails Plaza, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2010
- Brother v. CPL Investments, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2004
- Reycraft v. LeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.