Legal Opinion
Reycraft v. Lee
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 22, 2009No. E046248PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RAMIREZ, P. J.
Plaintiff and appellant Patricia Reycraft appeals from the trial court’s ruling she does not have standing to maintain a cause of action for damages against defendants for monetary damages under Civil Code section 54.3.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiff has elected to proceed only on a single cause of action against defendants for money damages under section 54.3 based on an alleged violation of sections 54 and 54.1, also known as the California Disabled Persons Act (DPA). Section 54, subdivision (a), states in pertinent part as follows: “Individuals with…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Joan Hangarter v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company, and the Paul Revere Life Insurance Company Unumprovident Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- People Ex Rel. Lockyer v. Shamrock Foods Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Ghirardo v. AntonioliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Brenda Pickern Floyd Smyth Paul Heard, and Jerry Doran v. Holiday Quality Foods IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Antoninetti v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Turner v. Ass'n of American Medical CollegesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Rodriguez v. Barrita, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Mission Springs Water District v. VerjilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Flowers v. PrasadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.