Legal Opinion
Botosan v. Paul McNally Realty
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 20, 2000No. 99-55580PublishedCited by 211 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KING, District Judge:
Plaintiff-Appellee Kornel Botosan (“Ap-pellee”) filed a private action against Defendants-Appellants Chuck and Judith Ru-sten (the “Rustons”) and Paul McNally Realty, Inc., dba Realty World (“Realty World”; collectively, “Appellants”), alleging violations of the Americans With Disabilities Act (“ADA” or the “Act”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq., and California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act, Cal. Civ.Code § 51 et seq. Appellee claims he was denied access to Realty World’s real estate office due to a lack of handicapped parking. Appellants argue, inter alia, that Ap-pellee is not…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Thomas Jefferson University v. ShalalaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Coates v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by211 opinions
- Schutza v. CuddebackDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2017
- Molski v. M.J. Cable, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Emily Snead v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Company, a Delaware Corporation James McIntoshCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Doug Wander v. Jack S. Kaus Irene B. KausCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Molski v. GleichCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
206 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.