Legal Opinion

Hankins v. Department of Finance & Administration

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 6, 1997No. 96-1465PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ray Thornton, Justice.

This is a second review of this controversy. In 1991, George Hankins, appellant, obtained a default judgment against Larry McElroy for $25,869, on the basis of losses' sustained from unpaid promissory notes together with losses of $1,000 relating to-the sale of a Camaro and $1150 relating to the sale of a GMC truck. In an attempt to recover the McElroy judgment, Hankins sought a declaratory judgment against Lawyers Security Company, the surety, for a $25,000 bond required for McElroy as a motor-vehicle dealer. Lawyers offered to settle the claim by paying Hankins $2115…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brimer v. Arkansas Contractors Licensing BoardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  2. Grinning v. City of Pine BluffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  3. Darragh Poultry & Livestock Equipment Co. v. Piney Creek Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  4. Winters v. EldersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  5. Hankins v. McElroySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Ford v. KeithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  2. ARK. DEPT. OF HUMAN SERVICES, ST FRANCIS DCFS v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  3. Bell v. BershearsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  4. City of Benton v. Arkansas Soil & Water Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  5. Warr v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API