Hankins v. Department of Finance & Administration
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Ray Thornton, Justice.
This is a second review of this controversy. In 1991, George Hankins, appellant, obtained a default judgment against Larry McElroy for $25,869, on the basis of losses' sustained from unpaid promissory notes together with losses of $1,000 relating to-the sale of a Camaro and $1150 relating to the sale of a GMC truck. In an attempt to recover the McElroy judgment, Hankins sought a declaratory judgment against Lawyers Security Company, the surety, for a $25,000 bond required for McElroy as a motor-vehicle dealer. Lawyers offered to settle the claim by paying Hankins $2115…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Brimer v. Arkansas Contractors Licensing BoardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Grinning v. City of Pine BluffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
- Darragh Poultry & Livestock Equipment Co. v. Piney Creek Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
- Winters v. EldersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- Hankins v. McElroySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Ford v. KeithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
- ARK. DEPT. OF HUMAN SERVICES, ST FRANCIS DCFS v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Bell v. BershearsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- City of Benton v. Arkansas Soil & Water Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- Warr v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.