Legal Opinion

Warr v. Williamson

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 21, 2004No. 03-1474PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jim Hannah, Justice.

Gaye N. Warr appeals an order of the Pope County Circuit Court awarding Kathleen Williamson costs under Ark. R. Civ. P. 68 (2003). Warr alleges that Williamson’s one dollar offer of judgment under Rule 68 was not a bona fide offer and so could not trigger an award of costs under Rule 68. We reverse the circuit court and hold that the offer of one dollar was not a bona fide or good faith offer as required to trigger an award of costs under Rule 68. We also hold that because the law on what sort of offer is required to trigger costs under Rule 68 was not settled at the time…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. AugustSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Jones v. AbrahamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  3. HRR Arkansas, Inc. v. River City Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  4. Bratton v. GunnSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  5. Bell v. BershearsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Beal v. McGuireAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Jester v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  3. Anderson v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2010
  4. LaFont v. MixonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
  5. Regions Bank v. GriffinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API