Legal Opinion
William Grosjean v. First Energy Corporation Toledo Edison Energy
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided November 13, 2003No. 02-3361PublishedCited by 200 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOGGS, Chief Judge.
William Grosjean appeals the district court’s summary judgment for his employers, First Energy Corporation and its Toledo subsidiary, Toledo Edison Energy, (collectively “First Energy”), in his age discrimination action against them. Gros-jean had lost his supervisory title and duties after his superior had rated him as inadequate in dealing with his subordinates. The district court granted summary judgment because Grosjean failed to demonstrate that First Energy’s proffered reason for the demotion, the unfavorable rating, was a mere pretext. We affirm on the…
2Cases cited69 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Shirley J. MITCHELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TOLEDO HOSPITAL, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- O'CONNOR v. Consolidated Coin Caterers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by200 opinions
- Henry Dicarlo v. John E. Potter, Postmaster GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Mickey v. Zeidler Tool and Die Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Rachid v. Jack In The Box IncCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- Brenda K. Woodman v. Wwor-Tv, Inc., News America, Inc., and Fox Television Stations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Peggy Blizzard v. Marion Technical CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
195 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.