Legal Opinion
Rachid v. Jack In The Box Inc
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided June 25, 2004No. 03-10803PublishedCited by 497 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EDITH BROWN CLEMENT, Circuit Judge:
Ahmed P. Rachid (“Rachid”) filed an age discrimination claim under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-34, alleging that he was terminated from his managerial position at Jack In The Box, Inc. (“JIB”). Because Rachid established a prima facie case and because issues of material fact concerning JIB’s proffered reason for terminating Ra-chid are disputed, summary judgment was improper and this case is REVERSED and REMANDED.
I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
Rachid was employed by JIB from October 1995 to February 2001. Patrick Powers…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Hazen Paper Co. v. BigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Desert Palace, Inc. v. CostaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by497 opinions
- Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Turner v. Baylor Richardson Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
- Mission Consolidated Independent School District v. GarciaTexas Supreme Court · 2012
- White v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. LHC Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
492 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.