Legal Opinion

People v. Smith

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 8, 2016No. E062858APublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SLOUGH, J.—

Defendant Michael Lee Smith appeals from the summary denial of his Proposition 47 resentencing petition. (Pen. Code, § 1170.18.) Using Riverside County Superior Court’s standard petitioning form, Smith sought to have two felony second degree commercial burglary (§ 459) 1 convictions (counts 1, 2) designated as misdemeanor shoplifting (§ 459.5). As part of his petition, Smith declared as to both counts that ‘“[t]he value of the check or property does not exceed $950.00.” The People responded by representing Smith “is entitled to resentencing” on count 2 and requesting a…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. People v. WoodheadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. People v. RiveraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. Horwich v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Kavanaugh v. West Sonoma County Union High School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  5. People v. RizoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. HolmCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. McLane v. GoPlus Corp. CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2021
  3. People v. Castrejon CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2021
  4. People v. Osotonu, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  5. People v. OsotonuCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API