People v. Smith
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SLOUGH, J.—
Defendant Michael Lee Smith appeals from the summary denial of his Proposition 47 resentencing petition. (Pen. Code, § 1170.18.) Using Riverside County Superior Court’s standard petitioning form, Smith sought to have two felony second degree commercial burglary (§ 459) 1 convictions (counts 1, 2) designated as misdemeanor shoplifting (§ 459.5). As part of his petition, Smith declared as to both counts that ‘“[t]he value of the check or property does not exceed $950.00.” The People responded by representing Smith “is entitled to resentencing” on count 2 and requesting a…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- People v. WoodheadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- People v. RiveraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Horwich v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Kavanaugh v. West Sonoma County Union High School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- People v. RizoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. HolmCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- McLane v. GoPlus Corp. CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2021
- People v. Castrejon CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2021
- People v. Osotonu, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- People v. OsotonuCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.