People v. Holm
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BANKE, J.—
Introduction
After defendant Jon F. Holm was convicted of second degree burglary, he filed a petition under Proposition 47 1 seeking to reduce his offense to misdemeanor shoplifting under Penal Code section 459.5. 2 The trial court denied his petition on the ground the private country club from which he stole a flat screen television and golf balls was not a “commercial establishment” within the meaning of that section. We conclude otherwise and reverse and remand.
Background
In 2013, defendant was charged with burglary, receiving stolen property, and false impersonation. 3 (§§…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Imperial Merchant Services, Inc. v. HuntCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- People v. Sherow CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2015
- Warfield v. Peninsula Golf & Country ClubCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. CochranCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- People v. J.L.California Court of Appeal · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. Osotonu, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- People v. OsotonuCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
- People v. SchmidtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019