Legal Opinion

People v. Holm

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 7, 2016No. A143873PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BANKE, J.—

Introduction

After defendant Jon F. Holm was convicted of second degree burglary, he filed a petition under Proposition 47 1 seeking to reduce his offense to misdemeanor shoplifting under Penal Code section 459.5. 2 The trial court denied his petition on the ground the private country club from which he stole a flat screen television and golf balls was not a “commercial establishment” within the meaning of that section. We conclude otherwise and reverse and remand.

Background

In 2013, defendant was charged with burglary, receiving stolen property, and false impersonation. 3 (§§…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Imperial Merchant Services, Inc. v. HuntCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  2. People v. Sherow CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. Warfield v. Peninsula Golf & Country ClubCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. People v. CochranCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  5. People v. J.L.California Court of Appeal · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. Osotonu, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  2. People v. OsotonuCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
  3. People v. SchmidtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API