Legal Opinion

McLane v. GoPlus Corp. CA4/2

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 12, 2021No. E072046Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 1/12/21 McLane v. GoPlus Corp. CA4/2 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO CHRISTOPHER MCLANE, Plaintiff and Respondent, E072046, E072049 v. (Super. Ct. Nos. CIVDS1819150 & CIVDS1823718) GOPLUS CORP. et…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Madden v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Gentry v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Baltazar v. Forever 21, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2016

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API