Legal Opinion
Tynes v. Uniroyal Tire Co.
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided April 24, 1984No. 60090PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REYNOLDS, Judge:
Debby Tynes appeals Oklahoma Employment Security Commission’s denial of unemployment benefits. Denial of benefits was based upon Board of Review’s finding that Tynes was discharged for misconduct. Tynes was dismissed for accumulating tar-dies/ early leaves in excess of those allowed by Uniroyal.
The Employment Security Act of 1980, 40 O.S.1981 § 2-406, provides “an individual shall be disqualified for benefits if he has been discharged for misconduct connected with his last work, if so found by the Commission.” The Act does not define “misconduct connected with his last work,”…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Boynton Cab Co. v. NeubeckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
- El Paso Natural Gas Co. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
- Arizona Department of Economic Security v. Magma Copper Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
- Blankenship v. Board of Review, Oklahoma Employment Security CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
3Cited by19 opinions
- Vester v. Board of Review of Oklahoma Employment Security CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Garden View Care Center, Inc. v. Labor & Industrial Relations CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
- Farm Fresh Dairy, Inc. v. BlackburnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Garman v. State, Employment Security DepartmentNevada Supreme Court · 1986
- Giovanoni v. Review Board of the Indiana Department of Workforce DevelopmentIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.