Legal Opinion
Blankenship v. Board of Review, Oklahoma Employment Security Commission
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 6, 1971No. 42811PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
IRWIN, Justice:
Albert N. Blankenship and 33 others (claimants) sought unemployment benefits under the Oklahoma Employment Security Act (40 O.S.1961 § 211 et seq.). The matter was submitted first to a Referee who found that claimants had voluntarily ceased work because of a labor dispute at employer’s (Ball Brothers Company) premises; that they voluntarily remained out of work because of the labor dispute; and that they were not eligible for unemployment benefits.
The Board of Review made findings of fact and conclusions of law and affirmed the decision of the Referee. On appeal to the district…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re the Eligibility of the Persons Employed at the St. Paul & Tacoma Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
- Lanyon v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Wilson v. Employment Security CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
- Achenbach v. Review Board of Indiana Employment Security DivisionIndiana Supreme Court · 1962
- Ashmead v. Florida Industrial CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Tynes v. Uniroyal Tire Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1984
- Hill v. Board of ReviewWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
- Ames v. Employment Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989
- McKinney v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
- Holdridge v. Tecumseh Products Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1977