Legal Opinion
Hunt v. Guimond
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 14, 2002No. AC 21504PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BISHOP, J.
In this mortgage foreclosure action, the defendant, Joseph L. Guimond, appeals from the trial court’s judgment awarding attorney’s fees and interest to the plaintiffs, L. Newton Hunt and Dorothy S. Hunt. The defendant claims that in awarding attorney’s fees, the court improperly repudiated the express terms of a stipulated judgment entered into by the parties. We *712dismiss the appeal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
The following facts are relevant to a resolution of this appeal. In 1987, the plaintiffs conveyed a parcel of land to the defendant and in partial payment…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jolly, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Beckish v. ManafortSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Gladysz v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Marine Midland Bank v. AhernConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Marine Midland Bank v. AhernSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
3Cited by4 opinions
- Barasso v. Rear Still Hill Road, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Brownstein v. SPILKEConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- In re Pro Hac Vice Admission of ReichConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- State v. ScottConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012