Legal Opinion
Brownstein v. SPILKE
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided November 3, 2009No. 29796, 29906PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BISHOP, J.
In these consolidated appeals, the substitute plaintiff, J. Diamond Properties, LLC (Diamond), and the defendant Georgina Spilke appeal from the judgment of the trial court denying Diamond’s motion for a deficiency judgment as to the defendant Kenneth C. Spilke. In AC 29796, Diamond claims that the court improperly determined that it failed to prove the fair market value of the subject property as of the date title vested in Diamond following a judgment of foreclosure and that it would be inequitable to grant the deficiency judgment. In AC 29906, Georgina Spilke contends that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. HaycockSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
- SKW Real Estate Ltd. Partnership v. Mitsubishi Motor Sales of America, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Citicorp Mortgage, Inc. v. WeinsteinConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Hunt v. GuimondConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
3Cited by8 opinions
- Derisme v. Hunt Leibert Jacobson P.C.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2012
- Derisme v. Hunt Leibert Jacobson P.C.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2012
- MTGLQ Investors, L.P. v. EgziabherConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Brownstein v. SPILKESupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Brownstein v. SpilkeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.