United States v. Kemp
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
*153Opinion of the Court
Darden, Chief Judge:
This case presents the question whether the special court-martial that tried the accused lacked jurisdiction because of the manner in which its members were. selected. Appellate defense counsel contend that the members were not personally chosen by the convening authority and that he did not apply the standards set forth in the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 25, 10 USC § 825.
Before trial, defense counsel filed with the convening authority a motion for discovery that, among other things, sought disclosure of (1) the identity of (a) the person…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- O'Callahan v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Ex Parte QuirinSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. CrawfordUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
- United States v. GreeneUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
- United States v. AllenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. DowtyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004
- United States v. LeonardCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
- United States v. DowtyNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2002
- United States v. BarteeCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2017
- United States v. DowtyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.