Legal Opinion

Beck v. Barnes

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 25, 1933No. Docket No. 8297PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This action was brought to quiet plaintiff’s title to two parcels of land. A trial was had and evidence both oral and documentary introduced. Findings of fact and conclusions of law were waived and a decree was entered adjudging that the defendant A. J. Barnes was the owner in fee of one of said parcels of land. This is an appeal by the plaintiff from said judgment.

It is the contention of the respondent Barnes that this is an appeal upon the judgment-roll alone, while appellant claims that the record is presented in accordance with the provisions of section 953a et seq. of the Code…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Houghton v. AustinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Jeffords v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Lake v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Hindle v. WardenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  5. Pierce v. WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Union FM v. Southern Cal. FMCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Otis v. Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Crow v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. Best v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. E. A. Strout Western Realty Agency, Inc. v. McCloudCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API