Legal Opinion

Otis v. Los Angeles County

California Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 1937No. L. A. 15944PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

The County of Los Angeles appeals from a judgment determining that the county tax levy for the fiscal year 1933-1934 was invalid and excessive in two particulars, and that the plaintiff was entitled to a refund of $250.80 of county taxes paid by him for that year.

The facts are not in dispute. The plaintiff as receiver of the properties of the Seventh and Grand Avenue Building Company, a corporation, in December, 1933, paid to the tax collector of the County of Los Angeles the sum of $9,166.34. That sum represented the first instalment of taxes for the fiscal year 1933-1934 levied against the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ryan v. ByramCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Madary v. City of FresnoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  3. Connelly v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Ferguson v. GardnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  5. Redman v. WardenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Southern Service Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Sanders v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Simms v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. City of Compton v. BolandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Rancho Santa Anita, Inc. v. City of ArcadiaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API