Callender v. MCO PROPERTIES
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CONTRERAS, Judge.
The questions presented in this appeal are whether the trial court correctly (1) granted summary judgment in favor of a party with the status of a landlord, finding that it was not liable for the injuries to an allegedly intoxicated customer to whom the landlord’s tenant sold liquor and (2) entered judgment for possessors of premises and their landlord after finding neither had a duty of care to an intoxicated person injured in the lake adjacent to their premises. On both issues, we affirm the trial court.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On March 26, 1988, appellant John…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Ontiveros v. BorakArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Markowitz v. Arizona Parks BoardArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Coulter v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Brannigan v. RaybuckArizona Supreme Court · 1983
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Stephens v. Bashas' Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
- In Re Minnesota Breast Implant LitigationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1998
- Tostado v. City of Lake HavasuCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- Henning v. Montecini Hospitality, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Felker v. McGhan Medical Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.