Legal Opinion
In Re Minnesota Breast Implant Litigation
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided November 13, 1998No. Civ. 97-1497 PAM/JGLPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
36 F.Supp.2d 863 (1998)
In re MINNESOTA BREAST IMPLANT LITIGATION.
Hurby Felker, et al., Plaintiffs,
v.
McGhan Medical Corporation and Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company / 3M Company, Defendants.
No. Civ. 97-1497 PAM/JGL.
United States District Court, D. Minnesota.
November 13, 1998.
John W. Carey, Sieben Grose Von Holtum McCoy, Carey, Fairfax, MN, Robert J. Gordon, Paul J. Pennock, Perry Weitz, Denise M. Dunleavy, Sheila Beckman, Weitz & Luxenberg, New York City, for plaintiff.
Bridget M. Ahmann, Linda Susan Svitak, Joseph Michael Price, Bruce Gregory Jones, Faegre & Benson, Minneapolis, MN,…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ferens v. John Deere Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. ParkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Cooney v. Osgood Machinery, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- T.H. v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals CorporationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- Flynn v. American Home Products Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- In Re Dow Corning Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2000
- Christian v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 2001
- Bhatia v. 3M Co.District Court, D. Maine · 2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.