Felker v. McGhan Medical Corp.
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MAGNUSON, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the Court upon Defendant Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company’s Motion for Summary Judgment against thirteen of the Plaintiffs. For the following reasons, Defendant’s motion is granted.
BACKGROUND
The present case involves silicone breast implants manufactured by Defendant Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company (“3M”) and Defendant McGhan Medical Corporation (“McGhan”). In 1997, several hundred silicone breast implant cases were *870transferred to this Court by the Honorable Jack B. Weinstein of the Eastern District of New…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ferens v. John Deere Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. ParkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Cooney v. Osgood Machinery, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re Minnesota Breast Implant LitigationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1998