State ex rel. Martin Painting & Coating Co. v. Industrial Commission

Martin denies that it violated Ohio Adm.Code 4121:l-3-10(C)(l) and (2), or 4121:l-3-10(K)(5). The widow-claimants disagree, and assert further violations of Ohio Adm.Code 4121:l-3-10(K)(6) and (8). They alternately dispute the necessity of award recalculation. For the reasons to follow, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals in its entirety.

Ohio Adm.Code 4121:l-3-10(C)(l) and (2) state:

“(1) The footing or anchorage for scaffolds shall be sound, rigid, and capable of carrying four times the maximum rated load without settling or displacement.

“(2) Scaffolds and their components shall be…