State Ex Rel. Richmond v. Industrial Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
{¶ 1} We affirm the court of appeals in this challenge to the denial of an additional award for violation of a specific safety requirement (“VSSR”). The appellant, Darrin C. Richmond, alleged that his employer, appellee Lamar Advertising of Youngstown, Inc. (“Lamar”), violated Ohio Adm.Code 4123:1-3-03(J)(1), resulting in his injury. The Industrial Commission, also an appellee, denied the award, and Richmond filed an action in mandamus in the Tenth District Court of Appeals. The magistrate of that court and the three-judge panel found that Richmond had not established by a preponderance of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State ex rel. Burton v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- State ex rel. Trydle v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- State ex rel. Frank Brown & Sons, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- State ex rel. Berry v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- State ex rel. Brilliant Electric Sign Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State ex rel. Zarbana Industries, Inc. v. Indus. Comm. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021
- State ex rel. 31, Inc. v. Indus. Comm. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
- State ex rel. Cassens Corp. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
- Beachwood City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Warrensville Hts. City School Dist. Bd. of Edn.Ohio Supreme Court · 2022
- State ex rel. Camaco, L.L.C. v. Albu (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.