Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Quality Tower Service, Inc. v. Industrial Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided March 15, 2000No. 98-1117PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Per curiam
The dispositive issue in this case is: Did QTS comply with Ohio Adm.Code 4121:1-3-08(G) so that it is not responsible for the alleged VSSRs? For the following reasons, we hold that QTS did comply with this specific safety regulation and that Garaux unilaterally violated the rule. Accordingly, we reverse the court of appeals’ judgment and grant the requested writ of mandamus.
QTS contends that it complied with Ohio Adm.Code 4121:1-03-08(G) because it provided Garaux and Reed “properly marked equipment more than suitable for the job,” Pyron told Garaux on site to use the company’s equipment and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State ex rel. Frank Brown & Sons, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- State ex rel. Cotterman v. St. Marys FoundryOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- State ex rel. Martin Painting & Coating Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State ex rel. Hirschvogel, Inc. v. MillerOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- State ex rel. R.E.H. Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State ex rel. Byington Builders, Ltd. v. Indus. Comm. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
- State ex rel. Armstrong Steel Erectors, Inc. v. Indus. Comm. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
- State Ex Rel. Richmond v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2014
- State ex rel. Ohio Paperboard v. Indus. Comm. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
- State ex rel. Danstar Builders, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2006
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.